Here’s an interesting article about the fight against cancer.  I really like what the oncologist says below.  Don’t refer to cancer as a fight–because it implies someone or something will win.

Rethinking the war on cancer

We also tell you about Mayberry because of something Boston oncologist (and cancer survivor) Therese Mulvey told us. She has seen real progress in her 19 years in practice, but the upbeat focus on cancer survivors, cancer breakthroughs and miracle drugs bothers her. “The metaphor of fighting cancer implies the possibility of winning,” she said after seeing the last of that day’s patients one afternoon. “But some people are just not going to be cured. We’ve made tremendous strides against some cancers, but on others we’re stuck, and even our successes buy some people only a little more time before they die of cancer anyway.” She pauses, musing on how the uplifting stories and statistics—death rates from female breast cancer have fallen steadily since 1990; fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy have helped avert some 80,000 deaths from colorectal cancer since 1990—can send the wrong message. “With cancer,” says Mulvey, “sometimes death is not optional.”

Here’s a copy of a letter I sent to my U.S. Texas Senators and House Representatives to gain more support for Ovarian Cancer Research.

On Thursday, July 10, constituents visited your office seeking support for Ovarian Cancer research, prevention and education in FY 2009. I know my fellow constituents left you with literature about our request. Just in case, here is a quick summary of exactly what we need from you to help us fight Ovarian Cancer in FY 2009:

• Allocate $10 million in FY 2009 to the CDC Ovarian Cancer Control Initiative to expand activities that increase early detection, improve treatment options and enhance survivorship. The CDC’s highly-developed network of health care providers and cancer registries spearheads efforts in educating providers in identifying ovarian cancer symptoms and utilizing best practice guidelines.
• Support Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month and its goals (H.R. 671/Stabenow-Dole Resolution)
• Increase NCI funding by 9.5% to support and expand efforts to reduce cancer incidence and mortality and advance important research and awareness efforts that contribute significantly to our nation’s battle against ovarian cancer.
• Provide full funding in the amount of $16.5 million over three years, including $10 million in FY 2009, to support the implementation of “Johanna’s Law” (P.L. 109-475) – the Gynecologic Cancer Education and Awareness Act – which authorized a three-year national gynecologic cancer early detection and awareness campaign directed at women and healthcare providers.
• Provide $25 million in FY 2009 for the DoD Ovarian Cancer Research Program, which funds multidisciplinary research that employs innovative methods of investigation and grants awards to new investigators. In 2005, researchers discovered several biomarkers for early stage ovarian cancer, with the prospect of developing this information into an effective and much-needed early detection test. Additional funding will speed the development and clinical testing of a reliable, early detection tool – reducing and preventing suffering from ovarian cancer.

I would appreciate if you would inform me of the Congressman’s position on these initiatives.

On a more personal note, on Monday, I celebrated what would have been my mom’s 68th birthday. Her doctor ignored all the early detection symptoms that she described to him. I believe with all my heart that with the proper education for both my mom and her doctor it would have led to an earlier diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, she was diagnosed with Stage IV C ovarian cancer in May 2006 and died over a year later on August 2, 2007. This is why I encourage the Congressman to support research, prevention and education for Ovarian Cancer in FY 2009. It is vital to saving more mothers’ lives.

Please thank your office for taking the time to visit with the constituents on July 10, and I encourage the Congressman to support Ovarian Cancer Awareness month this September with a mention in the newsletter and Web site.

Best,
Janet Johnson

The Result: A phone call from one House Representative’s office telling me what they are doing to fight ovarian cancer and that we have an advocate on the Hill! Yay!

The one regret about my mom’s illness is that she did not have “The Talk” by her doctor that her cancer was terminal.  In my heart I knew there were no more options but the doctor could have told us our next step.

Most cancer doctors avoid saying it’s the end

Only one-third of terminally ill cancer patients in a new, federally funded study said their doctors had discussed end-of-life care.

Surprisingly, patients who had these talks were no more likely to become depressed than those who did not, the study found. They were less likely to spend their final days in hospitals, tethered to machines. They avoided costly, futile care. And their loved ones were more at peace after they died.

 

I received this Alert in my email today. Click on Take Action below and a letter is prepared for you to email your Senators and House Representative in your area.

Congress is Considering Additional Funding for NIH & FDA
Support Additional Funds for NIH and FDA
Take Action!

Congress is considering the FY 2008 supplemental appropriations bill this week. The committee intends to include $400 million for the National Institutes of Health in this spending package. If successful, the committee would provide the National Cancer Institute with up to an additional $65 million on top of the $4.8 billion already appropriated in FY 2008. The inclusion of these funds in a supplemental funding bill is extremely rare and illustrates the strength of support that cancer research has in Congress.

In FY 2008, NCI received a budget increase of 0.3 percent over FY 2007, while biomedical inflation rose approximately 3.5 percent. Five years of flat funding have significantly hindered research progress and have forced NIH and NCI to make difficult funding decisions and to make painful cuts to ongoing research projects, including the delay and scaling back of clinical trials. When the NCI budget falls, we see that ovarian cancer research is cut back significantly.

This additional $400 million would be enough for NIH to support an additional 700 research grants in FY 2008 at institutions across the country. An additional $65 million to NCI is much needed and will help NCI to maintain support for research and much-needed access to valuable clinical trials.

Secondly, Senator Herbert Kohl (D-WI) has offered an amendment to include an additional $275 million for FDA in the supplemental which will help ensure patient access to safe and effective drugs and therapies. Funding for FDA has not kept pace with inflation in recent years so this additional funding is needed now more than ever.

Please contact your elected officials to tell them that you support increased funds for drug safety and cancer research.

Here’s a worthy charity.   We need more funds allocated to Ovarian Cancer and this organization spreads the wealth to hospitals to fund research just for ovarian cancer.

OCRF Charity

Is your senator supporting the Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers Research Act? If not, send them a letter here!!!

Send your Senator a letter to start taking action!

The Senate has introduced the Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers Research Act. This bill authorizes the National Cancer Institute to make grants to public and nonprofit entities to establish research centers of excellence devoted to the discovery of ovarian cancer biomarkers.